How does a chain translate stablecoin activity into ecosystem value capture?
Well - first off, there has to be activity.
TVL (well, actually AuM) is how stablecoin issuers make money. No one else in the ecosystem makes money on AuM alone.
Generally speaking:
- The apps make money from trading / transaction volumes.
- The network makes money from transaction count
Indexing off of stablecoin AuM (and using AuM / TVL terminology interchangeably) is a very insufficient perspective.
Stablecoin AuM only tells you how big and how full your parking lot is.
Apps; network; ecosystem have no economics unless those stablecoins move.
As an industry we really need to move beyond TVL as the singular north star metric.
Solana might just be winning the GENIUS Era
Solana doesn’t host the most stablecoins. And yet: it boasts the fastest-growing stablecoin supply. In the nearly 3 months since Trump signed the GENIUS Act, Solana’s stablecoins in circulation have jumped over 40%, reaching $15b.
Ethereum remains the stablecoin leader, with $178b. But its growth post-GENIUS Act is much slower than Solana’s: 27%. Other chains have fared even worse (Base, Hyperliquid, Arbitrum) One major player is going in the wrong direction. TRON’s stablecoin supply shrunk nearly 4%.
We’re in the first months of a major shake-up. The GENIUS Act gave companies, banks, etc a green light to start experimenting with stablecoins. Now, these newcomers are weighing where to launch. “Payment stablecoins” (the focus of the GENIUS Act) need fast settlement at low cost to stay viable. There, Solana’s long beat Ethereum. It can leverage this edge to challenge the leader.
What I’m on the lookout for are signs that Solana can accelerate this momentum. The last 30 days have been especially promising. Anchored by a parade of partnerships, DeFi integrations, and product rollouts, Solana added nearly $3b in stablecoins – 25% growth. (Ethereum’s grew just 8% over the same period).
Stablecoins represent one of crypto’s new foundational pillars. Chains that can ride the wave effectively will fare the best long term. This is not a zero sum game: one chain’s victory does not require another’s defeat. But value will accrue most acutely to those platforms that host the most.
17.61 k
71
El contenido al que estás accediendo se ofrece por terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es autor de la información y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido solo se proporciona con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo enlazado para más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. Los holdings de activos digitales, incluidos stablecoins y NFT, suponen un alto nivel de riesgo y pueden fluctuar mucho. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti según tu situación financiera.


