I think @berachain did the right thing yesterday. The main consideration though being unintended consequences. In this case I think they made a judgement call and it was correct, having a key Dex get rekt probably sets you back more than halting the chain.
Many projects that could have prevented malicious actors from escaping with funds, chose to do nothing because they felt it set a precedent that they were not decentralised.
But inaction does not make you decentralised, being unable to do an action or coordinate an action makes you decentralised. If you are not decentralised then you need to accept that inaction makes you complicit in the activity.
In early DeFi we all aspired to be decentralised but most projects has major vectors of control at various levels. We thought if we wished it hard enough it would be true, but tbh I think if we had accepted and acknowledged the reality it would have been a forcing function.
Instead of larping we could have actually pushed for more transparency and eventually progress towards decentralisation.
Today Berachain has the ability to freeze those funds and roll back the chain, they could have chosen inaction, but they didn’t. In the future they may be sufficiently decentralised to not be able to act to save funds, that will also be fine. But we live in the present.
Now moral hazard of what if the government turns up and says shut the network down or freeze these funds. I actually think this is a risk but it is very possible the validators are sufficiently decentralised to resist this.
Rescuing $15m is a clear outcome, I am not sure if a DMCA takedown notice would be as effective. I guess we may find out.
But most importantly now the Bera community can have a hard conversation about how decentralised the validator set is and how (and whether) to try to push for more decentralisation.
4,28 mil
35
El contenido de esta página lo proporcionan terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es el autor de los artículos citados y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido se proporciona únicamente con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo vinculado para obtener más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. El holding de activos digitales, incluyendo stablecoins y NFT, implican un alto grado de riesgo y pueden fluctuar en gran medida. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti a la luz de tu situación financiera.